Same /goal Feature, Two Agent Personalities
I used Codex's /goal for weeks, then tested Claude Code's new /goal on tasks Codex failed; the behavioral difference is striking enough to document.
8 posts
I used Codex's /goal for weeks, then tested Claude Code's new /goal on tasks Codex failed; the behavioral difference is striking enough to document.
A friend asked if I'd take an AI transformation role. My take: don't save money, avoid IDEs, keep agents inspectable. GPT-5.5, two weeks old; 10 weeks left.
Two weeks with GPT-5.5 (SPUD): I've mostly dropped Claude Code. The leap isn't a few percent gain—old weaknesses fixed make agent design philosophy clear.
Karpathy dropped 'vibe coding'; Amazon requires senior sign-off on AI code. I explain how AI coding changed breadth, speed, and quality—but not ownership.
Another GPT-6 'release' went viral: fake news wins attention, real reporting is a niche. AI is making the problem worse, so I moved us back to Claude Code.
I wasted four hours on Claude Code's Chrome extension; Xiaohongshu posts got soft-throttled. AI didn't turn failure into success—it made failure faster.
Claude Code can install software, process data, and deploy apps. This is a meta-ability that gives ordinary users low-barrier control over computers.
I knew nothing about launching a website or SEO. Two days later my site was live; a week later, MiraclePlus came knocking. My firsthand Claude Code experience.